Quick Takes – Killing Medicine: Mandatory Killing of the Mentally Ill; Wither Medical Conscience; Euthanasia via Organ Harvesting

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Death peddlers gonna peddle death.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     In Nazi Germany, the mentally handicapped and the mentally ill were targeted for a “medical death” via “Aktion T4”.  The mentally ill again being targeted in Canada.

“Dedicated psychiatrists are often the only defense between patients with serious mental illness and suicide. But legalizing euthanasia shifts thinking 180 degrees because suicide has been redefined as health care and a right. Hence, protections — such as barring administered death to the mentally ill — soon come to be seen as obstacles.

“That has happened in Canada, where the government is erasing its weak provision that death must be “reasonably foreseeable” requirement to qualify for killing. Once that provision is repealed, psychiatric conditions diagnosed “irremediable” could qualify for death.

“This is the context in which the Canadian Psychiatric Association has warned the government not to “discriminate” against the mentally ill by barring them from lethal jabs when the law is changed. From the Association’s Position Statement (my emphasis):

   “‘2. Patients with a psychiatric illness should not be discriminated against solely on the basis of their disability, and should have available the same options regarding MAiD [medical assistance in dying, i.e., euthanasia] as available to all patients.

   “‘3. Psychiatrists will be mindful of the medical ethical principles as they relate to MAiD. They should not allow personal opinion or bias to sway patients who wish to consider MAiD as an option for addressing irremediable conditions.

     “‘4. While psychiatrists may choose not to be involved with the provision of MAiD, patients requesting MAiD must be provided with information regarding available MAiD resources and the referral process…

   “‘The CPA will continue to protect the rights and interests of patients with psychiatric conditions at all times, and with particular attention to the issues of decisional capacity, informed consent and irremediable conditions in the legislation and evolving landscape of MAiD. The CPA will advocate for the inclusion of appropriate safeguards in processes, protocols, procedures and legislation pertaining to provision of MAiD.’”

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

American Innovation In The Age Of Quarantine

     What’s a business, like a strip club, to do when it’s declared a non-essential service?

     Become an essential service… while still staying true to it’s core business model.

“In an effort to keep his dancers and kitchen staff employed during the coronavirus lockdown, a strip club owner in Portland, Ore., has created ‘Boober Eats.’ The service brings pub fare, delivered by strippers clad in booty shorts and nipple pasties, straight to the customer’s door.

“Shon Boulden, owner of the Lucky Devil Lounge, came up with the ingenious rebrand following Gov. Kate Brown’s mandate to shut down all ‘non-essential’ businesses, which follows the national trend of restaurants and bars remaining open on a delivery and takeout basis only. Boulden tells The Oregonian that the idea began as a joke he’d shared on social media. But when his community began to ask him for details on the service, he realized the business model had real-world potential.”

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (April 5th, 2020)

 

News of the Week for Apr. 5th, 2020


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | 1 Comment

Firing Line Friday: The Place of the Treaty in International Affairs

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     It is interesting just how much many people who now-a-days call themselves conservatives have taken a such a similar view of foreign and hostile tyrannical regimes compared to hard-Left radicals from half-a-century ago.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, War & Terror | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – That’s Racist! Free Speech, Parents, & Intellectual Diversity

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Hitler!!1! You’re all Hitler!!1!

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Since free speech encompasses horrible utterances (such as Social Justice rhetoric), it is considered evil because those who are evil (such as Social Justice advocates) can’t silence dissenters while true free speech is protected.

“A University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill professor recently called free speech racist and said he worries that if a Democratic presidential candidate wins the 2020 election it could spark another Civil War.

“Eric King Watts, an associate professor of communication studies, made the comments during his keynote speech “Tribalism, Voicelessness, and the Problem of Free Speech” that kicked off a two-day conference on free speech.

“‘Democracy needs free speech, but it is increasingly vulnerable to its excesses,’ Watts said in his speech.

“‘I will first set forth how freedom of speech is implicated in racism by linking its historical contingency to the production of blackened flesh,’ Watts said. ‘I will demonstrate how racism produces its uneven distribution of capacity and debility….’”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

How to Be a Conservative

     The question of just what is a “conservative” remains one that people are still asking. It goes beyond just a question of “what is a conservative” and “what is means to be a conservative” towards the question of “how to be a conservative”.

     The late, great Sir Roger Scruton addresses just this question.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

The So-Called Explicit Guarantee To Free Healthcare

Death, Rx

     One of the things that many foreigners, as well as some Americans, belittle the United States about is that there is no “free” socialized healthcare that the people have an explicit “guarantee” to, and further belittle the idea that ultimately we should expect people to be responsible for taking care of themselves.

     Such people seem to assume that if the government says the people will receive “healthcare” for “free”, that people will get all the treatment they need in a timely manner, and that people in the United States without insurance are left to either die to go bankrupt.

     The latest outrage is shock, shock I tell you, in stating the basic fact that mere demand will not spontaneously generate needed supply right this very second, and that hypothetically maybe we won’t have all the necessary medical equipment to treat everyone who needs it when they need it in all cases.

     Why doesn’t this prove that the free market system is a failure, and that a socialized alternative that “puts people ahead of profits” will and, unlike tat icky free market, have everything they need for all the people because the government explicitly guarantees it—because, after all, if the government guarantees a right to something, the that something will always be there? After all, Italy, France, and the U.K. all explicitly guarantee healthcare as a basic human right, and their promise of socialized healthcare magically makes it so, which is why everyone who needs all the proper medical treatment to fight Corona-chan are getting all the healthcare they were told they have an explicitly guaranteed right to, yes?

     No.

     In Italy, the elderly will be denied intensive care, with respirators denied for those aged sixty or over.

     In France, in some areas, anyone over seventy-five will no longer be intubated, with the only help to the eldest involving helping those patients die.

     And what about that vaunted paragon of free healthcare that guarantees the bestest of healthcare that the British are sooo lucky to have (for free!!1!)? Doctors will just write off patients that they don’t want to waste money on those who need it most, by restricting ventilators to those that the NHS deems to have a “reasonable certainty” of surviving.  But then, the NHS considers it reasonable to torture kill children by dehydration/starvation.

     And that’s is why government “explicitly guaranteeing” free stuff in the guise of a “human right” is such a scam. With socialized systems as in socialized healthcare, you a “right to healthcare” does not actually mean you have an actual right to actual healthcare; all it means is that you only have a “right” to whatever the government decides to let you have. That is not liberty or freedom; it is dependency and slavery.

Continue reading

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

News of the Week (March 29th, 2020)

 

News of the Week for Mar. 29th, 2020


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | 1 Comment

Firing Line Friday: The Case Against Freedom

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     B. F. Skinner is well known, even now, for his influence, but few realize that he was as advocate of personal freedom these days, despite just how much his ideology has triumphed, within, the hallowed halls of academia and all that is wrought therein.

      Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – Verboten on Campus: Equal Standards; Racist Language; Clapping

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Doubleplusungood naughty naughty!

     First, a little (WTF) mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Equality can mean a lot of things. In Australia, “equality” means making sure that it more important to have a demographic balance than the best minds necessary to prevent bridges and buildings from collapsing.

“Equality? No thanks. Women at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) will be able to enter engineering and construction degrees with a lower score on an admissions test than their male counterparts.

“The Sydney Morning Herald reported that UTS will allow women to enter engineering and construction degrees with a lower score on the Australian Tertiary Admission Rank (ATAR) than male students. Women can score 10 points lower than men and still be admitted into the degree programs.

“As the Herald reported, many universities in the country ‘allocate adjustment points based on disadvantage or illness,’ but UTS appears to be the first one to make the adjustment based on gender. As one can guess, the move to lower the entry bar for women is being done in an effort to get more women into engineering.”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment