News of the Week (August 25th, 2024)

 

News of the Week for August 25th, 2024


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged , | Comments Off on News of the Week (August 25th, 2024)

Firing Line Friday: Resolved: That Welfare Has Done More Harm than Good

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The question of whether the Welfare state is good or bad depends for far too many people on whether they are benefiting or if someone else is benefitting instead of them.   Between the GOP’s economic Leftward lurch and the Democrats trying to pay-off student debt or pay for home down payments, the question if welfare has done more harm than good is again an active one, just as it was thirty years ago when this was debated between William F. Buckley, Jr., Wayne R. Bryant, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles A. Murray, Robert L. Woodson, Frances Fox Piven, Robert Greenstein, Charles B. Rangel, with moderation by Michael E. Kinsley.

     Until next Friday.

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Quick Takes – Lesser Children Of Gaia: “More Than Human” Rights; Wyoming City Approves Rights For Nature; School of Sustainability

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: Sorry, you’re just not as important as some random rock.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     What fresh new collegiate study do we have now? How about support for inhumanity, in that it is more than just human, it’s inhuman. No, they literally call it “More Than Human Life” (MOTH).

“MOTH has already published a book promoting the idea that all of nature has rights and that the age of ‘human supremacism’ must end. This is made clear by the founder of the project, César Rodríguez-Garavito, a NYU law professor whose ‘current scholarship and legal practice focus on the intersection of climate change, biodiversity, rights of nature and human rights.’ He writes in the book’s introduction:

“‘I had founded the initiative that inspired this book, which I called the More-Than-Human Rights (MOTH) Project. Co-organized with colleagues at New York University’s School of Law, the MOTH Project brings together lawyers, scientists, Indigenous leaders, artists, writers, advocates, judges, journalists, philosophers, and other thinkers and doers from around the world who work together to advance ideas and practices that support the rights and well-being of nonhumans.

“The movement is steeped in neo-paganism — also made vividly clear in Rodríguez-Garavito’s introduction:

“‘Don Sabino did not speak of rights, but of life. ‘The forest is alive, there are spirits in the forest, they are the real rulers of the forest,’ he told me in a voice so quiet that it felt like an invitation to listen intently to the sounds all around us. . . . If the forest is alive—if the animals, the plants, the fungi, the river, the air, and the rocks are all animate beings—then we need to find ways to hear their voices and spirits.”

     Further:

“One of the law schools leading the charge for this novel legal theory is New York University School of Law, which in 2022 launched the More Than Human Life Project, or MOTH, an initiative of the law school’s Earth Rights Research and Action Clinic.

“The project “is an interdisciplinary initiative advancing rights and well-being for humans, non-humans, and the web of life that sustains us all,” according to its website.

“In addition to NYU Law, for example, Harvard University will offer a course this fall titled “Rights of Nature” that ‘will examine this fast-growing field, assessing the origins, practice, and potential of granting legal personhood to natural objects.’”

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Elections, Progressives | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – Lesser Children Of Gaia: “More Than Human” Rights; Wyoming City Approves Rights For Nature; School of Sustainability

More Than Blood, More Than Land

     For some, what makes Americans American is being a “common people”, a “common land”, and a “shared history”.   This is true of practically every single people with a homeland that have been identified as such for long enough.   This is not what makes Americans, well American.

     The idea, to some, that America is an “idea” is anathema and diminishes us from having a common and civic nation with deep historical roots in a land where those values are part and parcel of the deepest underlying pillars shared by others who are American, and relegates Americans as just a collective based on some sufficiently minimal blut und boden whose sufficiently distant ancestors also had. Unsurprisingly, it is this later view which may be the reason why so many purported “Nationalists” seem to feel more in tune with “Nationalists” of foreign countries more than they do their fellow Americans.

     “[I]t’s a place and a people with a shared history” is something that could be said of any nation or group on Earth. What makes America exceptional and defines it is not just it being “ours” vs. “theirs”, but something beyond mere superficiality that many have forgotten. Such equivalization of legitimacy is no different than the Left’s insistence that all cultures are equal. Though some may be chauvinists of Western Civilization, those same people are not chauvinists of American Culture beyond a simple belief that it is special to them because it is theirs and not because is superior based on a more universal or objective criteria.

     Your humble author is reminded of Locke’s two famous treatises, in this regards.   Though a gross oversimplification, Locke identified many of the elements which make the civic nature of England (and the Anglo-sphere thereafter more broadly) conducive towards liberty in addition to virtue. Locke was both in error and accurate when he extrapolated this natural derivation of the culture going back centuries into universal values. It is true that only with that type of history built upon the Magna Carta, the Anglo-American Common Law, and all the associated expectation of rights and privileges thereof, could those values have come into existence, and they can not arise naturally elsewhere, but only be spread and incorporated elsewhere. The true genius of America, beyond what even the rest of the Anglo-sphere could claim, was that sharing those values on a more intrinsic and integral level is what defies us as a people and the place where those values are an intrinsic and integral element exist. That history is shared not with the present and the past, but with the future, regardless of whether we in the present or those in the future had an ancestor who shared the past.

     America itself is a repudiation of that more European sense of nationalism. Before independence, Americans and the British were a people and a place with a shared history… until an American ideal drove them apart.   That civic nationalism is a core element of America, and we wouldn’t be America without it. One of the things that makes America so exceptional is that it has a heritage that anyone so inclined can adopt and make their own, or that any native born American so inclined, can reject/forfeit.

     America was founded by a new people in a new land to make a new history — and grounded in an idea that had already organically come to be.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

The Woke Roots Remain

     With the many stories of “DEI” bureaucracies being dismantled in academic institutions, it is easy to think that it has been defeated and in retreat, with sane voices ready to declare victory. However, in some schools, they are just rebranding themselves and changing just enough to not explicitly run afoul of new prohibitions. The University of Southern Mississippi rebranded it’s DEI office as the “Office of Community and Belonging” while in the University of Florida their “Center for Inclusion and Multicultural Engagement” was shut down and replaced with an “Office of Community and Belonging” as well. What a coincidence!

     The problem, though, is much more extensive than simply pulling out any new woke weeds that sprout up doing the same thing under a new name. The roots of this problem remain, and not only will sprout up again, but spread. The roots are like an insidious rhizome that spreads underground undetected until it breaks the surface, and which continues to escape notice after the superficial problem has been ripped out. To continue to botanical analogy, wokeness—and the broader hard Left in general—tends to work sub rosa to normalize stepwise itself and when it overreaches, it retreats only far enough away to not give up more than it needs to, with that overreach being both a sacrifice and a learning experience.

Pictured: The Left at work.

     Falling into the trap of the superfiscial is one both conservatives and the broader Right have a tendency to fall into. When there is a disruption to their sense of normalcy, they fight against that and will relax once it’s gone, not realizing the problem continues to spread.   Instead of defeating the root problem, they end up playing perpetual whack-a-mole. As newer generations get used to it, the Right moves on to the newest thing. The fight against same sex marriage is the new normal and fighting transgender ideology is the new threat to be pulled out. That later fight, though, has only gained traction because it involves grooming children; an adult who tries to be able to “pass” as the other biological sex will likely gain traction as those rhizomal shoots spread and grow while those who pulled out the shoots that breached the Earth ignore it. Your humble author even noted to others over a decade ago that much of the transgender ideology is “baked into the cake”.

Continue reading

Posted in Education, Progressives | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

European Commission vs. Thought Criminals

     A member of the European Commission, and all around censorious Eurocrat Tierry Breton has openly warred that a -non-European company hosting a chat with a candidate for a non-European public office could be acting illegally due to “disseminating” doubleplusungood wrongthink.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (August 18th, 2024)

 

News of the Week for August 18th, 2024


Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on News of the Week (August 18th, 2024)

Firing Line Friday: Are Medical Costs Controllable?

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The exponentially rising cost of medical care, even above that of inflation, has long been catnip for those who call for bigger government, including those who wish to controls costs by rationing and/or euthanasia. Between Medicare and later Medicaid being inacted to the passage of Obamacare, let us look back at a less than successful proposal thirty years ago as Charles A. Sanders, J. Ward Kurad, and Richard Janewy discuss with William F. Buckley, Jr. the question of whether medical costs are controllable?

     Until next Friday.

Posted in Healthcare, Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: Are Medical Costs Controllable?

Quick Takes – Racial Discrimination Obsession: “Bias Incident” Reporting For Wrongthink Opinion; DEI Discrimination; Affirmative Action Stopped In California… Again

     Another “quick takes” on items where there is too little to say to make a complete article, but is still important enough to comment on.

     The focus this time: We can’t all be equal if some are not made more equal than others, after all.

     First, a little mood music:

     Carrying on…

     Crimes against those of Asian descent have been increasingly in the news lately. Rather than deal with actual criminals, some in Minnesota would rather track expressions of wrongthink.

“Separate from the reporting of hate crimes to the police — reports that are collected and reported annually by the state Bureau of Criminal Apprehension — the bill sets up a system to report incidents that fall short of criminal acts or are not reported because the victim chooses not to. People could report events to community groups that might be more trusted. And those reports could be gathered to provide a fuller idea of what is happening on the ground.

“Rebecca Lucero, commissioner of the state Department of Human Rights, told the House Public Safety Committee last week she supports expanded options for people who face slurs or verbal attacks to report them. She said her office and state lawmakers would then have a better idea of the volume of such incidents.

“‘Using the data collected can help you and community groups inform next steps — education, outreach or some other decisions you decide to make,’ Lucero told House members last month. Neither the human rights law or the hate crimes provisions apply, for example, to slurs shouted at a person because of their race, she said.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Quick Takes – Racial Discrimination Obsession: “Bias Incident” Reporting For Wrongthink Opinion; DEI Discrimination; Affirmative Action Stopped In California… Again

The Exception That Proves The Sex Binary Rule

     Reality is reality, just as A is A.   And the reality is that human beings are a sexually dimorphic species with two sexes with both physical and actually physiological differences, some acute and some statistically obvious.   There is no “spectrum”. There is no “gender identity” with any objective reality to it that is separate and distinct from biological sex. People insisting that a biological male can get periods if he identifies as a girl, that cancer works differently based on your gender identity, or that chromosomes magically change as if will alone can bend reality—are all science deniers and have rejected what people have seen clearly since time immemorial.

     There are two ways to approach this. The first is to do what people did before science informed us of sex determining chromosomes: Recognize the obvious. There were people with female genitalia who could get pregnant and give birth to a baby that they could nurse (Women) and there were those with male genitalia who could couple their genitalia with those women and impregnate them (Men). People recognized obvious differences in physical form, as well as how men tended to be bigger and stronger than women, while women showed many other actual physiological differences with men when it came to abilities and how they acted. Even then, people recognized that not everyone with female genitalia would be fertile or ever give birth, just as there were males who couldn’t impregnate a female. Nonetheless, “boys have a penis; girls have a vagina” as Kindergarten Cop explained to us.

     The other approach is the strictly scientific one.

“In humans, as in most animals or plants, an organism’s biological sex corresponds to one of two distinct types of reproductive anatomy that develop for the production of small or large sex cells—sperm and eggs, respectively—and associated biological functions in sexual reproduction. In humans, reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time. The evolutionary function of these two anatomies is to aid in reproduction via the fusion of sperm and ova. No third type of sex cell exists in humans, and therefore there is no sex ‘spectrum’ or additional sexes beyond male and female. Sex is binary.”

     Note, that caveat that is not inconsistent with the purely observational delineation of the sexes between male and female: Specifically that there are actual bona fide cases where a person does not develop in accordance with their chromosomes. As your humble author has previously noted: “there are abnormal cases of non ‘XX’ or ‘XY’ chromosome pairings (e.g. XO, XXY), or of a body developing in utero contra to chromosomes, but those are rare and not indicative of a ‘social norm’ of recognizing that the vast majority of people are indeed women or men, a fact confirmed by not only our entire history as a species, but of practically every other mammalian species in existence.”

     In other words, the exception proves the rule, in both senses of the word “prove”.

Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment