One Country, One Tyranny

     Back in 1997, when the British and Portuguese handed over Hong Kong and Macau, respectively, to the People’s Republic of China, the people of Hong Kong and Macau being handed over to the lion’s den were assured that, for at least a while, they would be able to retain their own systems, laws, and to a degree their governance, according to what became known as “one country, two systems”.

     However, as has already been shown with the recent protests in Hong Kong over an extradition bill, the Chinese Communists didn’t really mean the “two systems” part of the slogan.   Not limiting themselves with the power to grab any denizen of Hong Kong or Macau and try them in secret elsewhere (if the people so taken are that lucky), now the Communist regime wants to implement their tyrannical “social credit system” that rewards loyalty while punishing descent.

“[T]he provincial government of Guangdong Province released a three-year action plan (2018–2020) for the development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area.

“…

“The new action plan lists 100 items, placed into nine different categories, such as building modern industries that are competitive internationally; improving living conditions and the business environment; and accelerating the process of opening up “a new front,” a Party slogan referring to economic reforms.

“In that category, the social credit system was mentioned. In particular, the Greater Bay Area would “explore the implementation of a rewards and punishment credit system for companies.”

“In another Guangdong Province document released on July 5, authorities explained that the plan aimed to further develop the “one country, two systems” model and integrate ‘credit and information sharing’ between Guangdong Province, Hong Kong, and Macau.”

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on One Country, One Tyranny

The Wane of Monoculturalism

     If there is one glaring side-effect of “fighting like the Left”, it is that seems to necessitate “thinking like the Left”, or at least gravitate thinking thereto, not only as it pertains to tactics and strategy—superficially at least—but as it regards ideological underpinnings.

     Such as is the case with the criticism of “asymmetrical multiculturalism”. For the Left, it is a tool to divide people, not only amongst identity groups associated with the Left, but to reduce America into a small intersectional identity group with it tarred with the appellation of “oppressor”. They insist on all cultures, both real and invented, be not just tolerated, but affirmed and venerated, while denying the same to the now designated “oppressors”.

     Your humble author has long been an opponent of the divisive and Unamerican concept of “multiculturalism” and how it has been used as a stalking horse for attacking the common American monoculture. America is diverse: Diverse states, diverse local community, a diversity of thought. However, there is nonetheless a common and unifying heritage and American essence that binds Americans and is what makes Americans to be Americans as a distinct people. America is built up from the individual to families and local communities, to come together and hold sacred something that we not only share, but share because we believe in it and it is part and parcel of being American, as those individuals, families, and local communities are the building blocks for something that binds us—not because we are compelled or obligated—but rather because it is that higher commonality that is held so dear.

     Fighting for that monocultural and precious inheritance is difficult, especially when the tolerance and anti-uniformity sentiments of Americans is exploited by the Left; this is especially so when some go out of there way to fit the stereotype of a small minded bigot who believes that people can not become Americans and feels that even some who are natural born Americans are not “of the body”, so as to speak. Rather than fight the long and hard fight against multiculturalism, some have decided to embrace it, but with a reversal of which side in the Progressive’s laid out scheme is good and which side is the villain.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Wane of Monoculturalism

Ohio vs. The Gaia Cult

     Throughout the world, including the United States, make places are declaring that “nature” and ecosystems, such as rivers and glaciers. The city of Toledo, Ohio voted to give legal rights to Lake Erie. It turns out the state of Ohio wasn’t having any of that idiocy.

(B) Nature or any ecosystem does not have standing to participate in or bring an action in any court of common pleas.

(C)(1) No person, on behalf of or representing nature or an ecosystem, shall bring an action in any court of common pleas. (2) No person shall bring an action in any court of common pleas against a person who is acting on behalf of or representing nature or an ecosystem. (3) No person, on behalf of or representing nature or an ecosystem, shall intervene in any manner, such as by filing a counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint, in any action brought in any court of common pleas.

(D) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the state or any of its agencies from enforcing the laws pertaining to environmental pollution, conservation, wild animals, or other natural communities or ecosystems.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (August 4th, 2019)

 

News of the Week for Aug. 4th, 2019


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (August 4th, 2019)

Firing Line Friday: The Socialist Workers’ Party and American Politics

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     Considering the second of the back-to-back Democratic Presidential debates have just concluded, ‘twould be interesting to see an informative interview with the 1968 Socialist Workers’ Party Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates, Fred Halstead and Paul Boutelle.

Continue reading

Posted in Elections, Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: The Socialist Workers’ Party and American Politics

Omnibus Blues For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In Nevada

     The one lucky break those who cherish their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms in Nevada got when the omnibus anti-gun bill, AB 291, was passed, was that the repeal of state preemption over anti-gun local laws was dropped from the final bill. With the legislative session over, and the maximum 120 day time limit for said session reached, Nevadans are free from that particular threat to their rights at least until 2021.

     However, the omnibus bill still contains a plethora of different restrictions, some added in at the last moment. A summary of the horrid provisions:

Continue reading

Posted in Gun Rights | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Omnibus Blues For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In Nevada

A Satire of Wokeness

     There is no finer satire than one the begs for the invocation of Poe’s Law. To properly satire, one must understand the target that they are satirizing. A perfect example of that is the Twitter account of Titania McGrath, which is a spot-on satire of a woke elitist. Douglas Carswell interviews the man behind the “Titania McGrath” twitter, Andrew Doyle, and between them present a far more informative picture of the modern Left than one gets from most other sources.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , | Comments Off on A Satire of Wokeness

The Political Age of Leeroy Jenkins

     If there is one thing that both sides of the political spectrum agree on is that Donald Trump has the knack for making people freak out and lose their s**t. Such was the case with a series of tweets attacking a quartet of Democratic members of Congress for being anti-American, and adding a dash of the “America: love it or leave it” attitude which pre-dates the age of Trump. Of course the Democratic quartet reacted and people accused Trump (who is married to an immigrant) of being anti-immigrant, a racist, the toenail of Satan, &c., because they’re already accusing him of all that simply for breathing. Of course, as well, this could have just been about the histrionics of the Democratic quartet, and others on the far Left of the party, self-destruction, if Trump’s shoot-from-the-hip tweeting didn’t go far beyond that to the point of referring to three of the quartet, who are natural born citizens, as having “originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe” now “telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful nation on earth, how our government it so be run.”

     That he talked about three natural born citizens as if they were immigrants, unsurprisingly led to legitimate criticism of such statements for being factually inaccurate and wrong.

“The only member of the squad who ‘originally came from countries’ beside the U.S. is Ilhan Omar, born in Somalia. Ocasio-Cortez was born in New York City, Rashida Tlaib was born in Detroit, and Ayanna Pressley was born in Cincinnati. Three of the four “originally came from” the United States of America, and presumably Trump doesn’t mean that our government is “a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world.”

“It is fair to read his remarks as contending that Tlaib should return to the Palestinian territories (her parents immigrated from there), that Ocasio-Cortez should return to Puerto Rico (where her mother was born; Puerto Ricans have been U.S. citizens since 1917), and that Pressley should return to someplace in Africa, even though her mother and father were both U.S. citizens and, to the extent she has discussed her family, her ancestors ‘immigrated’ many generations ago — involuntarily if they were slaves.”

     It was also further pointed out that this was also a political “own goal” that protected the Democratic quartet not only from Democratic leadership trying to rein them, but also dampen criticism from the moderates (including suburban Women who swung enough seats in November 2018 to give the House of Representatives to the Democrats.

“Trump manages to focus in on the least-legitimate lines of criticism, that these women supposedly come from some other country and that they are ‘loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run.’ They’re all elected members of Congress. Love them or hate them, they all legitimately won House races in heavily Democratic congressional districts. Each one has the same one vote out of 435 that every other member has.

“At the exact moment that Democrats are realizing the toxicity of identity politics, Donald Trump endorses the notion that these women are defined by where they come from.

“Not only did he attack the ‘squad,’ he managed to do it in a way in which no other prominent Democrat can continue to criticize them publicly, lest they be perceived as echoing the president’s contention that they should go back where they came from. At the exact moment the accusations and counter-accusations were set to do lasting damage, Trump just had to jump in and give them an attack that would unify them all. It often seems like Trump would rather have a bad news cycle that focuses on him than a beneficial news cycle that focuses on someone else.

“Trump could have and should have stayed quiet and let the Democratic infighting worsen and intensify. Failing that, it would have been easy to make a jab free of any xenophobia — something like, ‘Interesting to see “Progressive” Democratic congresswomen contending Nancy Pelosi is racist and that the Congressional Black Caucus doesn’t represent black voices. I’m sure Pelosi would be happy to send them on some long foreign trip to get them out of her hair and out of the headlines!’

“Instead, Trump made a comment that unites Democrats of every stripe and reminds them of their primary objective in the 2020 cycle, winning back the White House. The biggest change from the 2014 and 2016 elections and the 2018 midterms is that the suburbs, and in particular, suburban women, recoiled from Trumpism. Trump fans can argue, ‘ignore the tweets, focus on his policies,’ until they’re blue in the face. Significant numbers of voters in key demographics in key states aren’t willing to compartmentalize like that. Everyone around the president can read a poll and knows that his rage-tweeting is a liability; it is perhaps the biggest liability in a presidency that, with prosperity and a perception of peace, ought to be comfortably cruising to reelection.”

     Likely due to more reserved and reasoned heads, Trump tweeted out a more measured, yet still harsh, attack on the Democratic quartet, that quoted Sen. Linsay Graham:

“… we don’t need to know anything about them personally, talk about their policies. I think they are American citizens who are duly elected that are running on an agenda that is disgusting, that the American people will reject…”

     It is as if each side was going out of it’s way to rile up the other side’s base while using that to drive their own base into a frenzy, both ignoring the moderates, and even many on both the Left and the Right who don’t need to seek emotional catharsis from political rage. We are living, as the following image macro originally posted at RedState indicates, in a political age of Leeroy Jenkins, based off of a meme of a “World of Warcraft character that is known for screaming out his name before ignorantly charging headlong into battle, killing everyone in his party.”

Meme posted on RedState by poster “Bonchie”.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

News of the Week (July 29th, 2019)

 

News of the Week for July 29th, 2019


Continue reading

Posted in News of the Week | Tagged | Comments Off on News of the Week (July 29th, 2019)

Firing Line Friday: The Economics and Politics of Race

     In the hopes of encouraging a more civil, and illuminating, discourse, here is another episode of William F. Buckley, Jr.’s “Firing Line”.

     The question of racism and who is to blame for racial inequality is an old one. When one thinks of two persons of different races discussing the topic, one usually pictures two people shouting past each other and perhaps racial invectives. However, Buckley demonstrates that two serious minded individuals can have an insightful and illuminating discussion and exploration of the topic, even if they are not of the same race. Case in point, his discussion about the economics and politics of race with the brilliant Thomas Sowell.

Continue reading

Posted in Progressives | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Firing Line Friday: The Economics and Politics of Race