![\"sammich\"](\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/sammich.jpg\" "\\"sammich\\"")
Pictured: The Left's view of "womyn"<\/p><\/div>\n
The first crack in the oh-so-false fa\u00e7ade was seen during the Clinton Presidency.\u00a0 Clinton was accused of sexual harassment and even rape.\u00a0 Yet, despite this, the radical Feminists did not attack or even question Clinton; they went after his female accusers.\u00a0 The radical Feminists did not care about women, they only cared about attaining a few political goals, chief among these being extreme abortion practices.<\/p>\n
The second major crack in the radical Feminists’ fa\u00e7ade was seen when Sen. McCain chose Sarah Palin for his Vice-Presidential running-mate.\u00a0 Rather then celebrate a successful reformist governor being on a major party Presidential ticket, the radical Feminists attacked<\/a> so savagely<\/a> that no male could do even a fraction of the same to a left-leaning female candidate.<\/p>\n Palin balanced both being Governor and raising a family.\u00a0 The radical Feminists have always said that they wanted for women to have a choice on how they lived their own lives.\u00a0 What these radical Feminists really meant. was that women should be “free” to choose what the radical Feminists believed women should choose.<\/p>\n The need to destroy this fictional “Patriarchy\u2122” to free “womyn” necessitates that all “womyn” think in lock-step with the radical Feminists.\u00a0 If a woman dares think for herself, the radical Feminists will destroy her more viciously than any gentleman would ever dare to even consider the contemplation of!<\/p>\n The third, and most telling, crack in the Feminists’ fa\u00e7ade, is now being seen under Barack Obama.\u00a0 This can be most clearly seen by the “Life of Julia” campaign where a seemingly husband-less “Julia” travels through life totally dependent on patriarchal statism to provide that money and support she no longer need to get from real men.<\/p>\n Indeed, in the left’s and Obama’s worldview, the STATE becomes father, brother, uncle, boyfriend, provider, and lover, all rolled up into one.\u00a0 In return for this ” Patriarchy\u2122”-free patriarchal statism, all women have to do is vote the way they are told to vote and help bring down the “Kyriarchy.”<\/p>\n But radical Feminism has not come full circle to the past they have professed to hate: A weak woman who needs a man to protect her.\u00a0 The Republicans’ criticism of Ambassador Susan Rice have resulted in the left calling Rice’s detractors “sexist<\/a>.” \u00a0Apparently “sexist” comments refer to comments assuming a woman’s competency.<\/p>\n The culmination of this, was Obama’s statement<\/a> that “if they want to go after somebody, they should go after me.” \u00a0Obama is acting as the ultimate macho stereotype of a strong man standing up to protect a weak woman.<\/p>\n We have truly arrived at a situation where not only is the state protector, provider, boyfriend, brother, and father all rolled up into one, but where a woman being strong and independent is considered an affront to feminism, but where a woman being weak and incompetent is considered a paragon of feminist virtue.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It has long been the trope of radical Feminists that women had to be able to stand on their own and be free to follow whatever life-path they wanted, without needing to rely on men or “The Patriarchy\u2122.” This drive … Continue reading