{"id":6330,"date":"2014-07-19T11:29:53","date_gmt":"2014-07-19T18:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=6330"},"modified":"2014-07-19T11:29:53","modified_gmt":"2014-07-19T18:29:53","slug":"federal-judge-declares-californias-death-penalty-unconstitutional-for-lack-of-executions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2014\/07\/19\/federal-judge-declares-californias-death-penalty-unconstitutional-for-lack-of-executions\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal Judge Declares California’s Death Penalty Unconstitutional… For Lack of Executions"},"content":{"rendered":"

     A Federal judge ruled the death penalty in California to be Unconstitutional because people sentenced to death haven’t been put to death.<\/p>\n

     Apparently, being alive is “cruel and unusual punishment” under the 8th<\/sup> Amendment of the Bill of Rights.\u00a0 The judge writes<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

“Inordinate and unpredictable delay… has resulted in a system in which arbitrary factors, rather than legitimate ones like the nature of the crime or the date of the death sentence, determine whether an individual will actually be executed. And it has resulted in a system that serves no penological purpose. Such a system is unconstitutional.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

     Further Scott Shackford over at Reason<\/em> notes<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

“The judge notes that a bipartisan panel has criticized the state\u2019s death penalty process as ‘plagued with excessive delay in the appointments of counsel for direct appeals and habeus corpus petitions, and a severe backlog in the review of appeals and habeas petitions before the California Supreme Court.’ The state keeps sentencing people to death and then is dragging its feet dealing with the process. Funding cuts to the Office of the State Public Defender are blamed for the limited pool of attorneys available to represent the defendants.<\/p>\n

“The judge also notes that after this extremely long wait, 60 percent of the handful of defendants (81 of them) who have made it through the whole state appeals process were granted relief from the death sentence once the case was taken up in federal courts.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

     This had<\/em> to be a Federal judge due to a peculiarity in the California Constitution, specifically in the state’s Declaration of Rights (Article I of the California Constitution).\u00a0 In the 1970’s, the infamous “Rose Byrd court” invalidated the state’s death penalty as a violation of the state’s Declaration of rights.\u00a0 In response, an initiative measure restored the death penalty by adding Section 27<\/a> to the state Constitution which read:<\/p>\n

\n

“SEC. 27.\u00a0 All statutes of this State in effect on February 17, 1972, requiring, authorizing, imposing, or relating to the death penalty are in full force and effect, subject to legislative amendment or repeal by statute, initiative, or referendum.<\/p>\n

“The death penalty provided for under those statutes shall not be deemed to be, or to constitute, the infliction of cruel or unusual punishments within the meaning of Article 1, Section 6 nor shall such punishment for such offenses be deemed to contravene any other provision of this constitution.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

     Of course, that being the law of the land wouldn’t stop the Leftist dominated California legislature and executive officers from using a Federal judge and complacent Governor and Attorney General from overthrowing the very Constitution which restrains them… again<\/a>.<\/p>\n

     A little mood music:<\/p>\n