{"id":40,"date":"2012-10-05T20:12:04","date_gmt":"2012-10-06T04:12:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=40"},"modified":"2012-10-05T20:27:17","modified_gmt":"2012-10-06T04:27:17","slug":"when-tech-blogs-fail-at-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2012\/10\/05\/when-tech-blogs-fail-at-science\/","title":{"rendered":"When Tech Blogs Fail At Science"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>or\u2026 making a Star Trek reference does not make you a nerd.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A recent article on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/wiredscience\/2012\/10\/dilithium-crystals-warp-drive\/\">Wired.com<\/a> attempted, and failed, to inform people about a genuinely interesting and potentially groundbreaking development in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.uah.edu\/news\/research\/3855-alpharetta-graduate-seeking-holy-grail-of-rocket-propulsion-system-alpharetta-graduate-seeking-holy-grail-of-rocket-propulsion-system#.UG-lv0Zup0L\">propulsion<\/a> within our solar system.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;While utilizing Star Trek as a way to bring attention to, and interest people in, science is laudable, it is abhorrent when both it and science are abused by allegedly technologically minded people for the purposes of a cruddy article.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Ignoring their clumsy, and misleading, attempt to call attention to the article by insinuating that faster than light <a href=\"http:\/\/www.space.com\/17628-warp-drive-possible-interstellar-spaceflight.html\">warp drive<\/a> was nigh, the real problem lies with the crux of their article: Lithium for use as fusion fuel for a spaceship.  The author writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;[T]his fusion reactor would be fueled by \u201ca few tonnes\u201d of deuterium (a heavy isotope of hydrogen) and lithium-6 (a stable molecule of lithium) in a crystalline structure \u2014 hence the \u201cdilithium crystal\u201d claim. Technically, dilithium is a molecule with two covalently bonded lithium atoms, while lithium-6 features six bonded atoms, but we can forgive them for the temptation of using a little poetic license.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This is factually incorrect.  <sup>6<\/sup>Li (i.e. Lithium-6) is neither a &#8220;a stable molecule of lithium&#8221; nor six lithiums bonded into a single discrete molecule. It is an isotope of lithium with three protons and three neutrons, in contrast with <sup>7<\/sup>Li (Lithium-7) which has four neutrons instead of three.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This would be excusable if it were posted by a 6-year old  was recounting what he heard from Al &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/ManBearPig\">ManBearPig<\/a>&#8221; Gore, but for a &#8220;tech&#8221; writer who ought to get at least the gist of the technology he\/she\/it is talking about, it is beyond pathetic.  Even Captain Picard agrees:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-41\" href=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2012\/10\/05\/when-tech-blogs-fail-at-science\/picard-facepalm\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-41\" title=\"Picard Facepalm\" src=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Picard-facepalm-300x226.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"226\" srcset=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Picard-facepalm-300x226.jpg 300w, https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/Picard-facepalm.jpg 700w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>or\u2026 making a Star Trek reference does not make you a nerd. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A recent article on Wired.com attempted, and failed, to inform people about a genuinely interesting and potentially groundbreaking development in propulsion within our solar system. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;While utilizing Star &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2012\/10\/05\/when-tech-blogs-fail-at-science\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[86,7],"class_list":["post-40","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science","tag-science","tag-star-trek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40\/revisions\/48"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}