{"id":3799,"date":"2013-10-25T17:16:27","date_gmt":"2013-10-26T00:16:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=3799"},"modified":"2013-10-25T17:16:27","modified_gmt":"2013-10-26T00:16:27","slug":"california-vs-the-2nd-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2013\/10\/25\/california-vs-the-2nd-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"California vs. The 2nd Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A California Court of Appeals has declared that the 2<sup>nd <\/sup>Amendment doesn&#8217;t apply to semi-automatic firearms, like an &#8220;AK&#8221; platform.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The <a href=\"http:\/\/bulletsfirst.net\/2013\/10\/22\/ca-court-appeals-lays-foundation-near-total-gun-ban\/#0rcmEdf4KcpwDEXK.16\" target=\"_blank\">court states<\/a> in part:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;We construe Heller as standing for the proposition that the right secured by the Second Amendment is &#8216;not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose&#8217; (Heller, supra, 554 U.S. at p. 626), but is instead the right to possess and carry weapons typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes such as hunting or self-defense . . .&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-3800\" title=\"California_Peoples_Republic\" src=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/California_Peoples_Republic.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"550\" height=\"366\" srcset=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/California_Peoples_Republic.jpg 550w, https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/California_Peoples_Republic-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This ruling has a far greater reach then it first appears. \u00a0It would grant the California <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">Grant Soviet<\/span> Legislature to ban both open and concealed carry, while banning virtually all guns.\u00a0 In <a href=\"http:\/\/bulletsfirst.net\/2013\/10\/22\/ca-court-appeals-lays-foundation-near-total-gun-ban\/#0rcmEdf4KcpwDEXK.16\" target=\"_blank\">other words<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;There are a bunch of &#8216;whatsoevers&#8217; in their ruling and that simply translates to &#8216;we don\u2019t like it so you don\u2019t get to do it.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><!--more-->&#8220;But the most important line in that ruling is the part that goes: &#8216;<strong>the right to possess and carry weapons typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes such as hunting or self-defense&#8217;<\/strong>.&#8221; (Bold in original)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What makes this a truly frightening ruling is that California&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/leginfo.ca.gov\/const.html\" target=\"_blank\">constitution<\/a> <em>does not include a right to keep and bare arms<\/em> in any way, shape, or form!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The complete ruling can be seen <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calgunsfoundation.org\/2013\/10\/ca-court-appeal-holds-second-amendment-doesnt-protect-semi-autos\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>, or below:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p  style=\" margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;\">   <a title=\"View PEOPLE v. ZONDORAK, California 4th District decision on Second Amendment, &amp;quot;Assault Weapons&amp;quot; - 10&#x2F;21&#x2F;13 on Scribd\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/177970998\"  style=\"text-decoration: underline;\" >PEOPLE v. ZONDORAK, California 4th District decision on Second Amendment, &amp;quot;Assault Weapons&amp;quot; &#8211; 10&#x2F;&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"scribd_iframe_embed\" src=\"\/\/www.scribd.com\/embeds\/177970998\/content?start_page=1&#038;view_mode=scroll&#038;show_recommendations=true\" data-auto-height=\"false\" data-aspect-ratio=\"undefined\" scrolling=\"no\" id=\"doc_92370\" width=\"100%\" height=\"600\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A California Court of Appeals has declared that the 2nd Amendment doesn&#8217;t apply to semi-automatic firearms, like an &#8220;AK&#8221; platform. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The court states in part: &#8220;We construe Heller as standing for the proposition that the right secured by the Second &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2013\/10\/25\/california-vs-the-2nd-amendment\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3800,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[41,24,51],"class_list":["post-3799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gun-rights","tag-2nd-amendment","tag-leviathan","tag-51"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3799"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3810,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3799\/revisions\/3810"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}