![\"\"](\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/The-Fall-of-The-Western-Roman-Empire.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
For many, the riots, revolutionaries, and cultural iconoclasts that seemed to come out of nowhere and have been met without any resistance are either a bit of temporary madness that affects someone else (which somehow the communities of those many are somehow immune to), or somehow an example of how the Left could only win<\/i> because cowards on the right preemptively surrender.<\/p>\n
Neither of those views, however, bear any semblance of reality.<\/p>\n
Both of these views assume that the sense of \u201cnormalcy\u201d that such view-holders have is indeed the framework upon which American society firmly sits, and the consequence of that view leads to either the expectation that \u201cit couldn\u2019t happen here\u201d or that it can only \u201chappen here\u201d due to preemptive surrender. Neither view considers that the groundwork by the Left hasn\u2019t already rotted the pillars of society<\/a> and instituted a framework sub rosa <\/i>conducive towards the Left\u2019s beliefs and ethos, leaving only a superficial shell ready to be replaced be a \u201cnew normalcy<\/a>\u201d custom fit for the new framework.<\/p>\n There is no better demonstration of this fundamental change that so many are blind to, including those who now wholly agree with the new way of thinking, than the redefinition of fundamental terms<\/a> and double-meaning of slogans. For example, to many, \u201cman\u201d still refers to a biological male and that gender is a synonym for biological sex; but for increasingly \u201cgender\u201d is defined as an \u201cidentity\u201d that is separate and district from biological sex (which is now considered a spectrum or even nonexistent as a category) and that insisting that a \u201ctrans-woman\u201d is a \u201cman\u201d is pure ignorance.<\/p>\n Such is also an example of what racism means. The term \u201cracism\u201d means, though increasingly rarely, the idea that one race is superior to another and the assorted actions and behavior thereof. However, the \u201cacademic\u201d definition of racism is a combination of not only a belief in racial superiority\/animus, but also of being in a \u201cposition of power\u201d.<\/p>\n White people, for example, have the unsrivable<\/a> sin of \u201cWhiteness\u201d and can only be tolerated if they actively destroy this \u201cWhiteness\u201d that somehow flows through them like the Dark Side of the Force.<\/p>\n \n This is quite literally Original Sin for social politics. No Tabula Rasa. You're born a "bad white" and need to actively follow certain rules in order to be a "good white." You think terms like "the religion of social justice" is hyperbole until you read this in the NY Times. pic.twitter.com\/B03qlnyPqS<\/a><\/p>\n — neontaster (@neontaster) June 21, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n \n