![\"\"](\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/SCOTUS-Biology.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
The Supreme Court, in all its derision sanity, has decided that the plausible biological presumption, that a married couple are the natural and biological parents of a child, somehow impossibly<\/a> applies<\/a> to same-sex couples:<\/p>\n “Arkansas had resisted, arguing that the birth certificate was a record of parentage for the child, rather than a document about the marriage.<\/p>\n “But the high court rejected that argument, saying that in situations where a child is conceived from an anonymous sperm donor, the mother\u2019s husband is still required to be listed. Denying that same accommodation to same-sex couples violates the 2015 Obergefell ruling that established a national right to same-sex marriages.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The Supreme Court, in Obergefell rules that there was no distinction between opposite sex marriages and so-called same-sex marriages beyond “irrational animus”. Apparently objective and obvious biological reality is not “irrational”.<\/p>\n There are physical and actual physiological differences between the two sexes. We are a dimorphic species that reproduces sexually via<\/em> coupling between males and females. It can pre presumed, according to social dictates, that a child of an opposite sex marriage is the product of such coupling.<\/p>\n In contrast, it is biologically impossible for a child to have two natural and biological parents of the same biological sex.<\/p>\n This is as insane as when California declared<\/a> that a gay couple not being able to produce a child between them were infertile because a straight couple not being able to do so either is considered proof of infertility. Of course, that a straight couple attempt to reproduce through the normal means of coitus is something that a same-sex couple are biologically incapable <\/em>of, is irrelevant to the revealed truth of social justice<\/em> that asks not what scientifically is or is not, but how many queer genderfluid snowflakes can twerk at the end of a pins…<\/p>\n Just goes to show, that as far as the law is concerned… reality is just a social construct…<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A birth certificate is a record and statement of accurate fact. Statements of accurate fact are now Unconstitutional. On birth certificates, there are places to state a child’s father and a child’s mother. Why? Because a child is conceived from … Continue reading \n