{"id":11731,"date":"2016-06-02T00:09:38","date_gmt":"2016-06-02T07:09:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=11731"},"modified":"2016-06-02T00:09:38","modified_gmt":"2016-06-02T07:09:38","slug":"drinking-for-two","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2016\/06\/02\/drinking-for-two\/","title":{"rendered":"Drinking for Two"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Would you serve a pregnant woman alcohol?\u00a0 If you are a New York City bartended, you&#8217;d better make it a double because the woman is <a href=\"http:\/\/bigstory.ap.org\/00f36eefd6d74852b7165cdea0334068\" target=\"_blank\">drinking for two<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;A pregnant woman shows up at a New York City bar and wants to go in and order a drink despite health warnings against consuming alcohol while expecting. Should the tavern serve her?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;It&#8217;s against the law to refuse, under city Human Rights Commission guidelines released Friday. They center on expansive protections for pregnant workers but also say mothers-to-be can&#8217;t be kept out of bars or denied alcoholic drinks just because they&#8217;re expecting.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;&#8216;Judgments and stereotypes about how pregnant individuals should behave, their physical capabilities and what is or is not healthy for a fetus are pervasive in our society and cannot be used as pretext for unlawful discriminatory decisions&#8217; in public venues, the new guidelines say.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This seems an area that both Progressives and libertines (not <em>real<\/em> libertarians) endorse: Forcing businesses and workers to surrender any moral agency, and to cater to their every whim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What ever happened to the &#8220;right to refuse service&#8221;?\u00a0 This isn&#8217;t racial or even gender discrimination. Unlike with cakes, flowers, &amp;c. for Gay couples, there is <em>literally<\/em> an innocent life involved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><div id=\"attachment_11732\" style=\"width: 260px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-11732\" class=\"size-full wp-image-11732\" title=\"preggers-and-booze\" src=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/preggers-and-booze.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/preggers-and-booze.jpg 250w, https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/preggers-and-booze-200x300.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-11732\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Make it a double, I&#39;m drinking for two! *hic*<\/p><\/div><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This isn&#8217;t even about denying a pregnant woman a &#8220;right&#8221; to drink while pregnant.\u00a0 This is about forcing a bartender contribute to fetal alcohol syndrome.\u00a0 Arguments about how the bartended was hired to do a job and must do it, and that if the bartender really doesn&#8217;t want to serve booze to a pregnant woman, they are free to quit.\u00a0 This is a <em>Hobson&#8217;s<\/em> Choice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A bartender\u2014<em>anyone<\/em>\u2014should not be forced to surrender their own moral agency and <em>just follow orders<\/em> to harm another innocent human being and a prerequisite to holding a job.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><!--more-->&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;If a bartender can refuse to serve a patron who has had one too many because that additional drink is harmful, than why can&#8217;t a bartender refuse a pregnant patron because that drink is harmful?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The irony is that the law that this new rule is based on was about <em>protecting<\/em> pregnant women and mandating that they be treated differently and deferently, while this new rule requires the exact opposite.<\/p>\n<p><meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PoliticHatBlog\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ThePoliticalHat\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Drinking for Two\"\/><meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Would you serve a pregnant woman alcohol?  If you are a New York City bartended, you'd better make it a double because the woman is drinking for two.\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/preggers-and-booze.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Would you serve a pregnant woman alcohol?\u00a0 If you are a New York City bartended, you&#8217;d better make it a double because the woman is drinking for two: &#8220;A pregnant woman shows up at a New York City bar and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2016\/06\/02\/drinking-for-two\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11732,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,17],"tags":[24,57,68],"class_list":["post-11731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-healthcare","category-progressives","tag-leviathan","tag-war-on-women","tag-wtf"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11731","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11731"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11731\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11906,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11731\/revisions\/11906"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}