{"id":11676,"date":"2016-05-10T00:47:19","date_gmt":"2016-05-10T07:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=11676"},"modified":"2016-05-10T00:47:19","modified_gmt":"2016-05-10T07:47:19","slug":"begun-the-bathroom-wars-have","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2016\/05\/10\/begun-the-bathroom-wars-have\/","title":{"rendered":"Begun, The Bathroom Wars Have"},"content":{"rendered":"

     North Carolina has declared that men’s restrooms are for men, and women’s restrooms are for women.\u00a0 This would have elicited nothing more than a “well obviously” from people in the past.\u00a0 But we are experiencing “interesting times”, where “men” and “women” are defined not by objective biological reality, but by the “feelz” of a scant few who wish to force their “identities” on others… regardless of the cost.\u00a0 Needless to say, the outrage that real<\/em> men are supposed to use the men’s room and not the ladies’ room has been palpable and hypocritical<\/a>.<\/p>\n

     Virtue-signaling hypocrite Bruce Springsteen<\/a> is one example of this insanity.\u00a0 He canceled a concert in North Carolina because men weren’t allowed into the ladies’ restroom.\u00a0 This was so beyond the pale for him, that he had to make a moral stand; this makes it clear that he thinks that prosecuting, in the most vicious way, Gay people is totes OK, since he was happy to play in Dubai<\/a> where these things tend to happen!\u00a0 Bryan Adams<\/a> was another virtue-signaling hypocrite who boycotted Mississippi for the same reason, and with the same hypocrisy played a concert in Egypt<\/a>.\u00a0 Of course for them, it’s all about the filthy lucre when they are not busy virtue-signaling… in order to get some more of that filthy, filthy lucre.<\/p>\n

     In response to this outswelling of support for men in ladies’ restroom, the city of Charlotte has illegally passed<\/a> an ordinance which outlaws all sex-specific bathrooms and showers (or any other facility)!<\/p>\n

\n

“Any biological man \u2013 regardless of whether he ‘identifies’ or ‘expresses’ himself as a man OR as a woman \u2013 now has the legal right under the City\u2019s amended ordinance to access the most intimate of women\u2019s facilities (and vice versa). Under the ordinance, Charlotte businesses may no longer offer or enforce sex-specific facilities and face penalties if they do.<\/p>\n

“<\/strong>Before the amendment, the public accommodations ordinance had two separate parts.<\/p>\n

“The first part prohibited denying anyone ‘the full and equal enjoyment of the … facilities … a place of public accommodation because of race, color, religion, or national origin.’<\/p>\n

“The second part prohibited discriminating on the basis of sex, but exempted ‘[r]estrooms, shower rooms, bathhouses, and similar facilities which are in their nature distinctly private.’<\/p>\n

“Adding the new categories of ‘sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression’ to the second part of the public accommodations ordinance would not have suited the objectives of radical activists to overhaul existing bathroom policy. Therefore, City Council eliminated the second part of the ordinance completely, including its bathroom and shower exemptions.<\/p>\n

“They moved ‘sex’ to the first part and added the new classifications. So, the new language is just this:<\/p>\n

“‘It shall be unlawful to deny any person the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of a place of public accommodation because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or national origin.’<\/p>\n

“‘This is a boneheaded blunder and a further embarrassment to Charlotte.'”<\/p>\n

“If ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’ mean that a transgender must be allowed to use the bathroom and shower of choice, then ‘sex’ means that ALL men must be permitted to use women\u2019s facilities and vice versa. The City Attorney says that\u2019s not what was intended, but it is what the language says.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

     But it’s only the eeevil “Reich wing” religious nutballs who have a problem with this, right?<\/p>\n

     Nope<\/a>.<\/p>\n

     The crew who film the show “Transparent” about the live of “trans-people” are up in arms<\/a> over “trans-friendly” toilets:<\/p>\n

\n

“The beef is that men, women and transgenders can all enter as they please, making it uncomfortable for some of the crew. Women are particularly worried about walking in and seeing a dude peeing at the urinal. Now this is interesting … we’re told several crew members are too scared to complain, for fear they’ll be labeled ‘transphobic,’ which would be the kiss of death on that set.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

     Remind me again who has power<\/em> and privilege<\/em>?<\/p>\n

     But… but… attacks on children would never really happen, right?<\/p>\n

     Wrong<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

“Seattle Parks and Recreation has confirmed an adult male inappropriately used a female locker room at Evans Pool in Green Lake while a youth swim team used the facilities”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

     But that’s just an isolated incident, right?<\/p>\n

     Nope<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

“A sexual predator who falsely claimed to be transgender and preyed on women at two Toronto shelters was jailed indefinitely on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

Justice John McMahon declared Christopher Hambrook \u2014 who claimed to be a transgender woman named Jessica \u2014 was a dangerous offender.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

     But… but… it’s not like a city or college is actively trying to aid and abed perverts, right?<\/p>\n

     Hell no<\/a>!<\/p>\n