{"id":11465,"date":"2016-04-11T01:29:02","date_gmt":"2016-04-11T08:29:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/politicalhat.com\/?p=11465"},"modified":"2016-04-11T01:29:02","modified_gmt":"2016-04-11T08:29:02","slug":"science-is-not-a-good-substitute-for-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2016\/04\/11\/science-is-not-a-good-substitute-for-god\/","title":{"rendered":"Science Is NOT A Good Substitute For God"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;An article over at reason.com claimed that science is a good <a href=\"http:\/\/reason.com\/archives\/2016\/03\/25\/science-is-a-good-substitute-for-god\" target=\"_blank\">substitute for God<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;Religious believers tend to be happier than non-religious folk, according to a long line of psychological research. Scientists have suggested several possible explanations for this phenomenon, including the ideas that religion offers a greater sense of control, provides a purpose for life, and reduces uncertainty.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8221; So if religious belief makes people more satisfied with their lives, why is secularism growing in many countries? A new study offers one possible answer: A belief in scientific and technological progress can also serve as a source of life satisfaction. Indeed, it may even offer more lifetime happiness than religion does.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;The study appeared in the journal Personality and Individual Differences, and the research team that conducted it was led by Olga Stavrova, a psychologist at the University of Cologne. The researchers first did a deep analysis of how the belief in scientific and technological progress affects the life satisfaction of a representative sample of nearly 1,500 Dutch citizens. They then compared life satisfaction measures with belief in sci-tech progress across 72 countries. In both cases, they found &#8216;a strong belief in scientific\u2013technological progress was associated with an enhanced sense of personal control, which in turn contributed to higher life satisfaction.'&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This, of course, ignores the very basic fact that science and faith are not the same thing.\u00a0 If you have <em>faith<\/em> in technology or &#8220;science&#8221; than you do not grok science.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Science has nothing to do with <em>faith<\/em> or <em>belief<\/em> but in <em>doubt<\/em> and the means one goes about whether ones theory is consistent with reality.\u00a0 The late Richard Feynman put it best:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/QkhBcLk_8f0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The problem with using science as a substitute for God or any other religious faith, is that religious faith will invade the realm of science.\u00a0 One ceased to be a investigator of how the universe works, and more akin to Thomas Aquinas&#8217; views wherein the Bible was declared perfect, and if the science contradicted it, the science is wrong.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We can see this happening today, especially in the &#8220;social sciences&#8221;, wherein ideas about &#8220;critical theory,&#8221; &#8220;intersectionalism,&#8221; and such have the status of gospel, with the &#8220;scientific&#8221; journals being nothing more than canticles of a secular faith.\u00a0 Rather than liberate the mind, treating science as a substitute for The Devine, allows religious notions and feeling to invade willy-nilly all other aspects of life.\u00a0 As the veritable Ace of Ace of Spades HQ said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8220;The Left&#8217;s disbelief in God does not free them from superstition &#8212; rather, it frees the superstition to infect all other modes of their thought.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><!--more-->&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;This new &#8220;science&#8221; becomes a false science that replaced the presumed false god the &#8220;smart set&#8221; haughtily rejected.\u00a0 It is nothing more than <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cargo_cult_science\" target=\"_blank\">Cargo Cult Science<\/a>, and we as a society are suffering from it right now.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/woman-scientist.gif\" alt=\"\" title=\"woman scientist\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-11294\" \/><\/p>\n<p><meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@PoliticHatBlog\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ThePoliticalHat\" \/><meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Science Is NOT A Good Substitute For God\"\/><meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"An article over at reason.com claimed that science is a good substitute for God. Science has nothing to do with faith or belief but in doubt and the means one goes about whether ones theory is consistent with reality.  \" \/><meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/woman-scientist.gif\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;An article over at reason.com claimed that science is a good substitute for God. &#8220;Religious believers tend to be happier than non-religious folk, according to a long line of psychological research. Scientists have suggested several possible explanations for this phenomenon, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/2016\/04\/11\/science-is-not-a-good-substitute-for-god\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":11294,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[86],"class_list":["post-11465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11465"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11465\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11532,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11465\/revisions\/11532"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/impeachreno.org\/politicalhat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}